Monday, November 1, 2010
A Very Old Man With Enormous Wings by Gabriel Garcia Marquez and The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman
The story 'A Very Old Man With Enormous Wings' is a tale of an old man who was an angel and landed on the earth. The yard he landed on was owned by Pelayo. Pelayo did not treat the old man very well and neither did the entire town or everyone round about. People came for miles to see the man of human form who had the wings of an angel. The wife of Pelayo thought of the winged man as a burden on her life. Father Gonzaga wrote to higher church leaders on what he should do with the angel. In the end the angel flies away and everyone is happy he's gone. 'The Yellow Wallpaper' is a story of woman who suffers from nervousness in her marriage and of her house. She describes many things in the house but, her main focus is the yellow wallpaper. The yellow wallpaper tortures her throughout the story. I think this lady is insane. She talks about a woman in the wall coming out and creeping around. In the end she ends up creeping around. It was a somewhat disturbing story. I think the narrator is indeed clinically insane. I liked the very old man with enormous wings a ton more. It is just more relatable and I could focus throughout the entire story. I plan on writing my essay about 'A Very Old Man With Enormous Wings' because I like it more. The old man to me is an angel. Throughout the story they say he could be demonic but I disagree. Elisenda sighs at the end because she is happy to have the burden of him released.
Sunday, October 3, 2010
Easter-wings by George Herbert
When first approaching the poem, I notice that it is written sideways. Also, it is in the shape of wings. This poem is deffinately not a traditional straight line, boring piece of work. The poem talks about the Lord giving us wealth and abundance in the beginging of life (Adam and Eve). But, how foolishly we lost the abundance. Through the Fall in the Garden of Eden is the main issue that George Herbert is approaching. When Adam and Eve partook of the forbidden fruit they gained knowledge which shut them off from the presence of the Lord. For the rest of mankind, everyone must work for their food and must labor dillegently because of Adam and Eves sin. He talks of decaying more and more and this could mean how we lost the ability to be immortal. We now decay in the ground because we are mortals. It also talks of how poor he became, i'm guessing when he say 'he' he means mankind. Adam and Eve lost all the beauty and glory from God so they became poor in spirit. At different points in the poem he relates to actual wings; one of these being the larks. Larks are old world birds that sing sweet songs. Another point is; "if I imp my wings on thine, affliction shall advance the flight in me". Imp means grafting additional feather unto the wings of a hawk to imporve its flight. Moving on from the wings it goes into flight. I like to think of it like we are all birds of the Lord, but we need his help to soar. Overall great poem, lots of hidden meanings throughout it.
Harlem by Langston Hughes
This poem is short consisting of only 7 stanzas. Most of the stanzas are questions. The rhymes are sun, run ..sore, over..meat, sweet. Langston Hughes starts this poem off with a intense question; "What happens to a dream deffered?" (what happens to a dream postponed, or delayed). He then choses to answer that question with more questions throught the poem; "Does it dry up like a raisin in the sun?". While we are trying to figure out what happens to a dream deffered, he keeps giving us more things to think about. From running, to sores, to sugar, to sags in heavy loads and the final question: "Or does it explode?". We don't know what happens to dreams when they are interrupted. They could go on in other places of the mind or wait for us to fall back asleep and continue. Maybe Langston is talking about dreams as in goals or things we look forward to. Do our goals in life dry up, fester, rot, crust over, sag or explode? We can't figure out what he is trying to mean because he answers each question with another question. I believe he wants us to believe that things we think too hard about explode. He gives us all those questions to contemplate and then he drops us off a cliff with the explode question. I think he doesn't want us to get a brain haemorrhage, but he does want to confuse us with what meaning it could be. I like how simple the poem looks, but it spans out into a million possibilities.
We Wear the Mask by Paul Laurence Dunbar
This poem has great imagery throughout the stanzas. The rhymes throught the poem are lies, eyes... guiles, smile, sighs, while, cries, arise, vile, mile, other-wise and over-wise (these don't rhyme exactly but it uses the "I" in its pronunciation). Paul Dunbar attacked the topic of hidding who we really are, in this poem. It starts out talking about: "the mask that grins and lies". Meaning we all may seem calm on the outside, but on the inside we are full of lies. Then it says, "the debt we pay to human guile" which means the things we do for humanity's deciet. "With torn and bleeding hearts we smile" also has to do with seeming calm on the outside but really fighting a war on the inside. The next lines kind of confront why we hide behind masks. It says we shouldn't because the world is not "over-wise" or over knowledgable. It basically says the world makes mistakes so why can't we? It then jumps back into the hiding part saying: "nay, let them only see us, while we wear the mask". We pray to God from our tortured souls and then we turn around and wear the mask. We should be humble and show our weaknesses and take off the mask. I also think this poem has to do with people not being who they really are. They hide behind a mask their whole lives pretending to be someone they are not. I like how it tells the world to dream otherwise, basically take off that mask and show the world for who you are.
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
The road not taken by Robert Frost
This poem is fantastic. I love the first scentence in the begining it says: two roads diverged. It's almost as if you can see the two paths. I like how he talks of looking down one road as far as he could ,but it bends and he can't see any further. I also like how he describes each path the first one being bent in undergrowth and the second one being grassy and wanting wear. He talks of both paths being worn almost the same and they equally lay with no leaves crunched by walking feet. So, either road he takes no one has taken, is what i'm getting out of this. He then says I doubt if i should ever come back. This poem has allot to do with choices we make in life. We can chose to do a career in medicine or in government, either choice will take us down a totally different path. We all try and look into the future as far as we can and see where we will be in ten years. That is impossible to do, no one can know where there going to be. That's the exciting part about life, not knowing what's going to happen. I like how Robert Frost ends the poem he says " I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference". He's basically saying don't be a follower. Make your life how YOU want it. Make choices that are yours.
Monday, September 27, 2010
To an Athlete Dying Young
When I first read the title 'To an Athlete Dying Young' I imagened an athlete dying when he first started a sport. When I read farther it had an amazing discriptive part about ,The time you won your town the race. It talks of people cheering, and bringing you shoulder high and setting you at your threshold down. That in essence, means like a throne to me. All athletes are on a pedestal in the peak of their careers. Then the poem switch gears and starts to get gloomy. The poem talked of fields where glory does not stay, so we know something happened. Either the athlete grew old and lived on or the athlete is dead. I see how it could be both because, an athlete can die in any one of us. But, the vibe I get from the rest of the poem is that he grew older and became slower, less athletic and someone faster and stronger replaced him. The poem says the name died before the man, that sentence is like a realization point in the whole poem. We realize that he's talking about how the man is still alive but the athlete inside of him is dead. No one remembers what he did, all they remember is a name that gets replaced with the next athlete. Glory doesn't last forever for athletes. It's brief and it leaves you to fend for yourself.
Monday, September 20, 2010
Poetry
Some people believe poetry stands for Pain Of Every Type Ruining You. Not all poetry is evil and boring. I like poetry, it can be exciting. Poetry is a release of all your sufferings and heartaches. It can be a spiritualy uplifting experience to release built up emotions. Poetry isn't just the old, boring, watered down bull crap you are used to. Poetry is modern and intruiging in every aspect. If your thinking of a dark coffee shop where goons who want to get on stage and bear their soul to the beat of a drum, your right and wrong. Coffee shop readings are still around but there is also slam poetry. People are picked by random and come on stage to express their every emotion. You can read slam poetry in anyway you like (fast, slow, in different languages, in different tones, your body language can also attribute to how you perform),their is no topic. You can talk of your struggles, your weaknesses, your day-day life or anything you can possibly think of. My perspective on poetry is slighty altered. Poetry is like music, the olden day music bores me and modern day music is fun to listen to. I like the newer poetry, but the older poetry puts me to sleep. Poetry can be fun depending on how you look at it.
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
How to read a poem.
Ah the joys of sitting down and reading a confusing poem. Most people are excited, but I groan at this thought. Poetry to me, is a confusing jumble of words meant to make me angry when I try to guess it's meaning. How to read a poem made me feel like less of a failure. It pointed out how poems are indeed confusing and theres not always one set way to interpret it. Reading a poem has a lot to do with attitude and technique. It's important to get the background on the author or where the poem is located in order for us to understand it. It's also important to know that you probably won't get the poem the first time you read it. Nothing is wrong with you, you just haven't cracked the code yet. Missing the point to a poem is very common and irritating. But, also understand that the poem cam mean anything readers want it to mean. If you are having a good day and the poem seems happy then it's happy. Poems are meant for us to interpret them and figure out what they mean to us. Reading poetry is a challenge, but it takes practice and as you read more poetry you'll start to grasp their meanings. Encountering a difficult poem is like a game or sport, it makes you work a bit. You can't expect to speed through a poem and grasp it's meaning. It's also a good idea to ask questions when approaching a poem for the first time. For example:
Who is the speaker?
What is the tone?
What situation is present?
If the poem is a question, what is the answer?
If the poem is an answer, what is the question?
These questions can help us to better understand the meaning to poems. The task is to grasp, to connect and to understand what the authur is trying to portray. Predictable and easy to digest poetry is very rare to come by. So, be prepared for the ultimate torment of trying to comprehend most poems.
Who is the speaker?
What is the tone?
What situation is present?
If the poem is a question, what is the answer?
If the poem is an answer, what is the question?
These questions can help us to better understand the meaning to poems. The task is to grasp, to connect and to understand what the authur is trying to portray. Predictable and easy to digest poetry is very rare to come by. So, be prepared for the ultimate torment of trying to comprehend most poems.
Sunday, September 12, 2010
How to say nothing in 500 pages.
Paul Roberts points out many, but common errors essay writers make on a daily basis. He talks of our (as in the students of this decade) excellent procrastination skills. By the time we do end up writing our 500 word essay on college football we have zero content. Making a dull subject, like college football, can be hard to make interesting. One should; find the argument, the approach, the andle and the wording that will make the essay fun to read. Paul also talks about avoiding obvious content. We should be against or for something by reasons or reasons of our own. Make sure the reasons behind the argument are keen and perceptive. We should also um up and dispose of trite and conventional points. We should also learn to take the less common side of arguments. Make a list of all the possible arguments and eliminate the ones that first come to mind. If they came to your mind first, obviously thirty other classmates are going to have the same ideas. Depending when he reads your paper will be the deciding factor of your grade. If this is the thirtieth paper talking of "College football is great for character building", he may give you lower grade because of the vain repitition of the class. Paul also talks about displaying or painting the picture of your point your trying to get across. He talks of moving away from the generality of the abstract statement to the concrete examples, facts and figures. We should also decide what we're going to say and say it. Avoid phrases like: "in my opinion", "as i see it", and " from my point of view". Say it in plain words, don't beat around the bush. Colorful, colored and colorless words are common writing errors also. We should avoid: "cool", "instances", "mother" and "limpid". Create scentences with words that are ment to produce a picture or induce and emotion. Overall Paul Roberts had several examples of common essay writing errors we should avoid. I liked how blunt he was. He helped me to become stronger in my essay writing skills.
Thursday, September 2, 2010
Walden. Where I lived, and what I lived for.
Walden was a very intellectual man who decided to spend a year or so out in the basics of nature. He bathed in a pond, and lived in a tiny cottage with no neighbors within miles of him. Walden went to the outdoors to find the meaning of life or, in esence, to live his life. "I went to the woods because i wished to live deliberately, to front on ly essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what i had to teach, and not, when i came to die, discover that I had not lived". Walden lived in an era where you could ramble on, not having a point and people would think you were a genius. Now a days all books must have a point, all stories must have a plot. Waldens writings are very dragged on to say a simple thing, like the sky is blue. He would explain how he was looking at the sky, what time of day, where he was, what he was thinking and the souroundings were included. He has good points though at one time he says: "why should we live with such hurry and waste of life? We are determined to be starved before we are hungry". I like that saying because why should be run through life without stopping for a second to enjoy it. We humans tend to have to look forward to something but, what he's saying, is to not have anything. He wants us to live life as naturaly as possible. Paragraph 14 is my favorite one because of the great metaphors he uses when he talks of waking up with intelligence. He wants us to learn to awaken not just physically but mentally in the mornings. He says: "All memorable events, i should say, transpire in the morning time and in a morning atmosphere. He asks us why we throw off sleep because, if we were to get sleep we might be able to accomplish somthing that day. He also says; " The millions are awake enough for physical labor; but only on in a million is awake enough for effective intellectual exertion, only one in a hundred millions to a poetic or divine life". Walden wants us to wake up and to live life as purely as possible. In paragraph 22 he talks of not knocking under and going with the stream. To me, this means work against the status quo. Do not do something just because everyone else is doing it. He also says; " If the bell rings why should we run?". I think he means if disaster strikes why should we panic and run, we should aproach our problems head on instead of running when the bell rings. Walden asks us to stop doing what we've always done, step out of the line and observe nature and live life the best you can.
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
A river runs through it USFS1919 The ranger, the cook, and the hole in the sky.
USFS 1919 was a very detailed account of the 17th year of the boys life. Throughout the story his detailed view on the nature and the people outlines the climax of the story. Bill Bell becomes the guy we would all like to be friends with or to be on his goodside. We also come to hate the cook and don't want to show mercy on him when he gets "rolled" by the boys so called 'next door neighbors' (the whore and the hairy butt man). I thought it was interesting throughout the story how we never once figured out 'the boys' name. I also liked the detailed account when he was the lookout watching for the lightning to strike that would start fires. He talks of the mountains healing him when he was a young boy. I also like the sentence: "I knew that, when needed, mountains would move for me". I love this because of the
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
